decentralized.ink

Ink vs Starknet

Which is more decentralized — Ink or Starknet? A side-by-side on consensus, nodes, clients and governance.

InkStarknet
GradeCC
TypeL2 · Optimistic rollup (OP Stack)L2 · ZK rollup
Nakamoto / stageStage 1Stage 1
Node / validator setInherits Ethereum securityInherits Ethereum security
Clients / sequencerSingle sequencer (Kraken)Single sequencer (StarkWare)
GovernanceKraken-led + SuperchainStarknet governance (token + council)
Key riskCentralized sequencerCentralized sequencer

Ink C

  • L2BEAT Stage 1 early in its life
  • OP Stack / Superchain alignment
  • Forced-exit guarantees
  • Centralized sequencer (Kraken)
  • Young, smaller ecosystem

Starknet C

  • Validity proofs (no challenge window)
  • L2BEAT Stage 1
  • Native account abstraction
  • Centralized sequencer & prover
  • Smaller ecosystem than OP/Arbitrum

Bottom line

Impressive Stage-1 status for a new L2; sequencer is still centralized. Strong cryptographic guarantees; operational decentralization is in progress.